Why Do We Keep Apologizing? A Relational Perspective
Apologizing can be a healthy way to acknowledge mistakes, repair relationships, and show respect. However, some of us seem compelled to apologize constantly—even when it isn’t necessary. This pattern of over-apologizing can reveal deep-rooted emotional and relational dynamics. From a psychoanalytic and relational perspective, frequent apologizing may stem from early life experiences, internalized beliefs about self-worth, and a desire to maintain emotional stability within relationships.
Understanding the Urge to Apologize
At its core, an apology signals that we recognize how our actions affect others, and in relational terms, it’s a way to maintain harmony. But when we apologize excessively, often in situations where there’s no apparent fault, we may actually be managing internal anxiety and fears rather than genuinely responding to the needs of others. Let’s delve deeper into why this happens.
1. Early Life Experiences and Self-Worth
Over-apologizing often traces back to early childhood experiences, especially in environments where love, acceptance, or stability seemed conditional. For example, a child who grows up in a household where they’re frequently criticized or punished for minor infractions might internalize the belief that they’re always on the verge of doing something wrong. This internalized guilt and fear of disapproval can manifest later in life as an automatic reflex to apologize, even when they’ve done nothing wrong.
- Example: Imagine a young woman, Kavya, who frequently apologizes at work for things outside her control—like the weather affecting a scheduled meeting or an unexpected delay in an email response. If she examines her family dynamics, she may recall that as a child, she was often blamed for situations beyond her control, leading her to apologize as a way to preempt criticism or disappointment.
In psychoanalysis, this pattern of over-apologizing can be seen as a repetition compulsion, where individuals unconsciously repeat behaviours from their past in an attempt to master unresolved emotional conflicts.
2. Anxiety and the Desire for Control
Anxiety often fuels the need to apologize. Apologizing can become a coping mechanism for alleviating feelings of uncertainty or discomfort. When faced with situations that trigger anxiety, people may apologize as a way to regain a sense of control and protect themselves from potential conflict or disapproval.
- Example: Ahmad, a college student, often apologizes for taking up “too much space” during discussions, even when he’s asked to share his opinion. For Ahmad, apologizing is a way to avoid potential judgment or rejection. The act of apologizing gives him a sense of control, making him feel as though he’s preemptively addressing any possible disappointment from others.
This behaviour can also be linked to what psychoanalysis calls the superego, an internalized voice of societal and parental expectations. When the superego is overly harsh, individuals experience heightened self-criticism and anxiety, leading them to apologize even when it’s unnecessary.
3. Relational Dynamics and Maintaining Emotional Safety
From a relational perspective, constant apologizing can signal a deep-seated need to maintain harmony and emotional safety. Apologizing serves as a relational tool to bridge gaps or mitigate tension. For individuals who fear conflict, apologies act as a buffer, keeping relationships “safe” by appeasing others, even at the expense of one’s own needs or boundaries.
- Example: For Preeti, saying “I’m sorry” is almost automatic in her close relationships, even when someone else is at fault. Her friends have noticed that she often says, “I’m sorry you feel that way” when they express frustration, even though she isn’t responsible for their emotions. Preeti’s apology is her way of maintaining emotional closeness; in her mind, avoiding friction is more important than pointing out when she isn’t at fault.
Relational therapy suggests that such patterns stem from early attachment experiences. If a person learnt that expressing emotions or asserting boundaries leads to withdrawal or punishment, they may develop an automatic tendency to apologize, using it as a tool to keep relationships stable and prevent abandonment.
4. People-Pleasing and Fear of Rejection
For many, over-apologizing is intertwined with people-pleasing behaviours. People who struggle with self-worth often feel a strong need for external validation and fear disapproval or rejection. Apologizing excessively becomes a way to seek acceptance, implicitly asking for reassurance that they’re not causing harm.
- Example: Abhishekh apologizes for everything, even minor mistakes like mispronouncing someone’s name. Deep down, Abhishekh fears that if he doesn’t apologize, people will think less of him. His apologetic behavior stems from a desire to be seen as kind, non-threatening, and likable—a form of self-protection against the fear of social rejection.
Psychoanalytically, people-pleasing can be linked to the false self-concept, where individuals suppress their authentic feelings to meet the perceived needs of others. Over time, people-pleasers may lose touch with their own needs and boundaries, resulting in excessive apologizing.
5. Difficulty Asserting Boundaries
Some people find it difficult to assert their boundaries, and apologizing becomes a way to navigate this discomfort. When boundaries feel too intimidating or unfamiliar to set firmly, an apology can serve as a “softening” mechanism that minimizes potential backlash.
- Example: Somya often says, “I’m so sorry, but I can’t make it,” instead of simply stating her unavailability. Her habit of apologizing reflects an underlying discomfort with setting clear boundaries, stemming from a fear of being seen as inconsiderate or selfish.
In relational therapy, developing a stronger sense of self and autonomy can help individuals move away from excessive apologies. Building confidence in setting boundaries allows people to communicate directly and clearly without feeling the need to diminish their own needs through apologies.
Breaking the Cycle of Over-Apologizing
Recognizing and shifting this pattern of over-apologizing requires self-awareness and a willingness to confront the underlying emotions and beliefs. Here are a few steps toward understanding and addressing this behaviour:
- Notice the Context
Begin by paying attention to when you feel the urge to apologize. Are there specific situations or people that trigger this response? Are you apologizing for something beyond your control or for simply expressing yourself? - Pause and Reflect
Before automatically saying “I’m sorry,” take a moment to reflect. Ask yourself, “Is this apology necessary? Am I genuinely at fault, or am I apologizing out of habit?” - Challenge Internalized Beliefs
Reflect on the beliefs fueling your need to apologize. Do you feel responsible for others’ emotions? Are you afraid of conflict or rejection? Consider how these beliefs developed and whether they’re serving you. - Practice Setting Boundaries
Practising assertiveness and boundary-setting can help reduce the need to apologize as a form of relational maintenance. Remind yourself that it’s okay to say “no” or to express discomfort without apologizing for your needs. - Replace Apologies with Gratitude
In situations where you feel compelled to apologize for things like “taking up time” or “asking for help,” try expressing gratitude instead. For instance, say, “Thank you for listening” instead of “I’m sorry for venting.”
Final Thoughts
Over-apologizing can be a deeply ingrained habit, often rooted in complex emotional and relational experiences. Psychoanalysis and relational perspectives remind us that our behaviours don’t exist in isolation but are intertwined with our pasts, our anxieties, and our desires for connection. By examining these underlying dynamics, we can start to break free from the compulsion to apologize unnecessarily. Cultivating self-awareness and practising self-compassion helps us establish healthier boundaries and communicate more authentically—allowing us to connect without diminishing our own worth in the process.
As relational psychoanalyst Jessica Benjamin notes, “Recognition of the other is a recognition of the self.” When we honour our own needs without feeling the need to apologize for them, we create space for authentic, balanced relationships where mutual respect can flourish.
Learn More
The Healing Power of Psychotherapy: More Than Just Uncovering the Past
Understanding the Essence of Psychotherapy
Psychotherapy is often seen as a powerful tool for healing, yet the nature of this healing is frequently misunderstood. While many believe that our mental struggles stem from past experiences we have repressed or forgotten, the truth is that healing is a multifaceted journey. The conventional view posits that traumatic moments from our past—be it neglect, humiliation, or emotional abuse—linger in our unconscious, disrupting our lives. The therapeutic journey then resembles a detective story, where the therapist guides us in uncovering these buried traumas to find relief.
The Detective Analogy: A Limited Perspective
In this narrative, it’s commonly thought that identifying the root cause of our pain—perhaps a belittling father or a mother who struggled with depression—will lead to healing. This perspective is appealing because it suggests a straightforward solution: uncover the trauma, and we will be free from its grip. However, while this view holds some truth, it overlooks a critical aspect of psychotherapy’s benefits.
Healing goes beyond merely understanding the past; it involves experiencing a new kind of relationship with another person—one that may have been absent during our formative years. Knowledge alone is insufficient for healing; we cannot simply grasp the facts about our painful experiences and expect to feel better. True recovery occurs when we have the opportunity to redefine our emotional landscape in the presence of a therapist who embodies the qualities that our original caregivers may not have provided: presence, kindness, empathy, and understanding.
The Role of the Therapist: A Reparative Relationship
The therapist’s role is not solely to unearth painful memories; it’s also to fill the emotional void created by past traumas. Through sustained interactions characterized by warmth, patience, and generosity, clients can begin to heal from fear, loneliness, panic, and shame. This reparative experience is essential for overcoming the scars of earlier wounds.
The therapeutic relationship provides a unique opportunity to rewrite our emotional narratives. It allows clients to experience what healthy, supportive relationships look like, helping them understand their worth and fostering a sense of safety that may have been missing in their earlier experiences.
The Challenge of Authentic Connection
However, this approach complicates psychotherapy significantly. It requires a genuine and authentic connection between the client and therapist—something that is not easily achieved. If a therapist is cold, judgmental, or emotionally distant, the healing process can falter. Unlike traditional medicine, where one can dislike a doctor but still benefit from their treatment, psychotherapy relies on a profound sense of trust in the therapist’s goodness, maturity, and kindness.
This level of connection is rare and often requires multiple sessions to develop, much like the bond with a true friend. Finding a therapist who embodies these qualities is crucial; without this bond, the therapeutic process can feel ineffective or even counterproductive.
The Long-Term Commitment to Healing
Additionally, this understanding of therapy tends to make it more costly and lengthy than many might prefer. If we view therapy as a mere quest to uncover hidden trauma, we may hope for quick fixes, believing that resolution is just a few sessions away. However, if we embrace the notion that healing is a process rooted in a reparative relationship, we may need to engage in therapy consistently over a longer period—perhaps weeks, months, or even years.
This extended commitment can create challenges, particularly for those navigating busy lives or seeking to avoid the complexities of emotional healing. Insurance companies and employers often favour quicker solutions, leading to a temptation to view therapy solely as a means to discover and address trauma.
The Danger of Superficial Healing
Yet, if we allow this temptation to shape our approach, we risk settling for a superficial understanding of therapy—one that seeks immediate relief without recognizing the need for a nurturing and supportive therapeutic relationship. True healing comes from shifting our perspective from the therapist as a detective to the therapist as a reparenter.
This change in perspective is essential for fostering genuine growth. We must recognize that healing is not merely about discovering past traumas but about creating a new foundation for emotional health and well-being. By prioritizing the quality of our therapeutic relationships, we set ourselves on a path to deeper understanding and lasting change.
Conclusion: Investing in the Healing Journey
Ultimately, by investing in a therapeutic relationship that genuinely supports our emotional growth, we honour our healing journey and set the stage for profound transformation. In seeking a therapist who embodies the qualities of an ideal caregiver, we can hope to find a solution that repays our trust and investment—a path toward a more fulfilling and emotionally healthy life.
Through this understanding, we empower ourselves to embrace the complexity of healing and to recognize the vital role of relationships in our journey toward emotional wellness. The path may be longer and more intricate than we initially envisioned, but the rewards of such an investment can lead to a deeper sense of self and a richer, more connected life.
Learn More
Subversion of Women in Indian Society: A Mask of Patriarchy Hidden in Jokes
In Indian society, patriarchy is woven deeply into the fabric of family structures, social institutions, and everyday life. Men have long used subtle and overt means to subvert women’s voices and expressions, maintaining dominance in ways that are both glaring and insidious. Feminist scholars have extensively explored the ways men subordinate women, laying bare the various strategies through which patriarchy manifests in homes, workplaces, and public spaces. Their research has illuminated how men exercise control over women, often by silencing, restricting, and infantilising them. As I delved into these academic works, I gained a nuanced understanding of the pervasive nature of gender inequality.
However, what perplexes me is how different the reality feels when I visit my village or observe casual family interactions, particularly in the media and pop culture. In spaces that are far removed from the scholarly lens, the narrative often shifts to one of supposed female dominance, particularly that of wives over their husbands. Television shows, comedy skits, and even personal conversations are replete with jokes about husbands being “emasculated” or controlled by their wives. There’s an oddly prevalent theme of wives holding superiority over their husbands, a form of playful banter that suggests women wield more power within the family dynamic than men. The reality, however, couldn’t be further from the truth.
The Disconnect Between Academia and Popular Culture
The contrast between what feminist scholars reveal and what everyday jokes portray is striking. In academic discourse, women’s oppression is well-documented and analysed. Books on subversion detail how women are silenced, subjected to patriarchal norms, and deprived of autonomy. Yet, when I step outside of academia and into the living rooms of families or watch a popular family comedy, I notice a radically different narrative—one that seems to reverse these roles. There is a near-constant joke, not about male superiority, but rather about how husbands are “henpecked,” submissive, or even afraid of their wives.
This discourse of women’s dominance, particularly of wives over husbands, exists as a form of comedic relief in Indian society. There are countless jokes about the “power” of women over their husbands, presenting wives as the real decision-makers and husbands as figures who comply with their demands. It’s easy to get confused by this duality. Are men truly acknowledging the dominance of women in some spheres, or is there something more complex at play?
A Psychological and Societal Compensatory Mechanism
After reflecting deeply on this contradiction, I came to realise that these jokes about the superiority of wives are not reflections of reality but rather a compensatory mechanism deployed by men. In private, men often subvert women in various ways, asserting dominance in the domestic sphere through control over finances, decision-making, and personal freedoms. In many cases, this subversion is subtle yet powerful—women are not allowed to express themselves freely, and their choices are shaped by the men in their lives. But, when it comes to publicly acknowledging this inequality, men cleverly deflect attention by making light-hearted jokes about their supposed submission to women.
This, I believe, is a psychological tactic. By positioning themselves as the ones being dominated in public discourse—albeit through jokes—men can maintain the illusion that all is well in the patriarchal structure. The propagation of this narrative allows them to avoid the uncomfortable truth of their own subversive behaviour. By laughing off the idea of wives dominating their husbands, men soothe their own consciences. It creates a false sense of balance—”Yes, we dominate, but women dominate us too!”—thus avoiding any real reflection on the deep-seated inequities that continue to exist.
The Role of Women in This Narrative
What’s even more intriguing is that women, too, often participate in these narratives. Many women, especially wives, seem to enjoy the public recognition that they “control” their husbands, finding some sense of empowerment in these jokes. It’s not uncommon for women to laugh along or even fuel these narratives, perhaps because, in a society where their actual power is so limited, this symbolic gesture of superiority offers some small comfort. However, this sense of control is purely superficial. It distracts from the very real ways in which women are oppressed. The supposed dominance of wives over husbands in jokes does little to change the realities of patriarchal control that operates behind closed doors.
In fact, this is precisely how patriarchy protects itself. Allowing this narrative to exist maintains the façade that power dynamics between men and women are more equal than they truly are. It allows both men and women to feel that there’s nothing wrong with the structure—after all, wives seem to be in control, right? But this “control” is illusory. The societal order remains untouched, and the underlying patriarchal mechanisms continue to operate smoothly, reinforced by the very jokes that seem to subvert them.
The Subversive Power of Jokes in Indian Society
In this way, humour becomes a tool for maintaining the status quo. By constantly repeating these jokes, society creates a shared understanding that women, particularly wives, hold some level of power over their husbands. This narrative serves as a protective veil for men, masking their subversive behaviour in the domestic sphere and allowing them to evade accountability. These jokes do not threaten the patriarchal structure; instead, they reinforce it by offering a superficial counterbalance to the very real subjugation women experience.
In conclusion, the subversion of women in Indian society is a complex and multifaceted process. Men dominate, bully, and silence women in countless ways, but they smartly turn the narrative into public by claiming a kind of victimhood masked in humour. This unique form of subversion allows both individuals and the broader societal structure to avoid confronting the ugly truths of patriarchy, enabling its continued existence under the guise of balance. Women’s subordination remains deeply ingrained despite these narratives of superficial female superiority. Understanding this duality is crucial if we are to challenge the deep-rooted patriarchal norms that persist in Indian society.
Learn More
Childhood: Why Does it Matter?
For over a century, we’ve accepted a compelling idea about human nature: that our childhoods set the tone for our adult lives. According to psychotherapists, those early years influence how we love, trust, and relate to ourselves and others. Yet, despite the intellectual appeal of this concept, many of us struggle to feel its truth deeply. Can those distant, hazy years really hold the key to understanding who we are today? How much of our present lives are shaped by fleeting memories, old photos, and family holidays? Could this theory of childhood’s profound influence simply be a widespread misconception?
To explore this further, let’s consider some of the most common questions—and challenges—surrounding this idea:
How Can Childhood Be So Important When Nothing Major Happened?
It’s easy to accept that traumatic childhoods, marked by abuse or neglect, can leave lasting scars. But what about the rest of us, whose childhoods involved nothing more than a few arguments or emotional ups and downs? Can these relatively uneventful years really shape us?
This question is reminiscent of the scepticism people had about microbiology in the late 19th century. At the time, many couldn’t believe that something as tiny as a microbe could contaminate an entire city’s water supply. They thought only big problems could have big causes. Similarly, we might underestimate how seemingly small or subtle experiences can deeply affect our psychological landscape. Just as an invisible bacterium can make us sick, small emotional dynamics in childhood can ripple through our adult lives in ways we don’t always recognize.
But My Parents Were Good People?
Even loving and well-meaning parents can unintentionally set off patterns that lead to challenges later in life. It doesn’t take overt abuse or trauma for us to feel the effects of difficult dynamics. A parent’s anxiety, emotional distance, or overprotectiveness can shape us in ways we might not even realize, leading to struggles in how we relate to ourselves and others.
Isn’t It Normal for Everyone to Have a Slightly Messed-Up Childhood?
Many people assume that difficult childhoods are just a part of life. Since everyone seems to have their share of struggles growing up, it might feel like there’s no point in reflecting on our own experiences. However, this mindset is similar to how people once viewed dental health in medieval times. Back then, tooth decay and pain were so common that they were considered a normal part of life. Yet today, we know these issues can be largely prevented with proper care.
Likewise, just because many people experience difficulties growing up doesn’t mean those struggles are inevitable or “natural.” With the right understanding and effort, we can address the emotional impact of our childhoods and reduce the prevalence of certain psychological challenges.
My Childhood Feels ‘Normal.’ What’s the Point?
We often struggle to question what we know best. Our families and early experiences are the backdrop of our lives—they feel normal because they’re all we’ve ever known. However, just like scientists use microscopes to detect things the naked eye can’t see, psychotherapists have tools to uncover the hidden influences of childhood on adult behaviour. In therapy rooms, connections between early experiences and present-day struggles become clear. Through patterns observed in countless individuals, therapists witness firsthand how childhood experiences often shape adult emotional landscapes.
I Don’t Remember My Childhood Having That Big of an Effect on Me?
Just because we don’t consciously remember how childhood shaped us doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. We don’t recall learning to speak, yet language became ingrained in us early on. Similarly, our emotional habits—how we handle relationships, process emotions, and view ourselves—are learned unconsciously during our formative years. These emotional patterns are often as fixed as our native tongue, which makes them difficult but not impossible to change.
If the Past Can’t Be Changed, Why Dwell on It?
It’s true that we can’t go back and change our childhoods. But by examining how the past continues to affect us, we can start to reshape its impact. Understanding the roots of our fears, anxieties, and patterns of behaviour can help us break free from them. Over time, we can learn healthier ways to interact with the world, opening up paths to greater creativity, openness, and self-acceptance.
Isn’t It Easier to Just Move On and Forget About It?
Avoiding these topics is understandable. Most of us have developed ways to protect ourselves from the pain or confusion we encountered growing up. But reflecting on the past isn’t about getting stuck there—it’s about finding a way to move forward. By exploring how our early experiences shaped us, we can let go of old defenses and embrace a more authentic, peaceful present.
The invitation to look back at childhood isn’t about assigning blame or dwelling on the past. It’s about understanding where we’ve come from so we can live more freely and fully in the present.
Learn More
The Essence of Psychology and Psychotherapy: A Deep Dive into Human Connection and Understanding
Psychology and psychotherapy, at their core, are about understanding the intricacies of the human mind, emotions, and behaviors. The essence of these fields lies in the deep, often transformative relationships between therapist and client, where healing and growth occur through exploration, insight, and connection. From the pioneering ideas of Sigmund Freud to the evolving theories of relational psychoanalysis, the heart of psychology has always been about more than just symptom relief—it’s about fostering genuine human understanding.
Freud and the Birth of Psychoanalysis
Sigmund Freud, often regarded as the father of psychoanalysis, revolutionized the way we think about the mind and therapy. His concept of the unconscious mind—where repressed thoughts, memories, and desires reside—opened up new avenues for understanding human behavior. Freud’s idea of transference, where clients project feelings about significant figures in their lives onto the therapist, highlighted the importance of the therapeutic relationship. This relationship, Freud argued, was the vessel through which unconscious conflicts could be brought to the surface, understood, and resolved.
Freud’s focus on the therapeutic relationship laid the groundwork for future developments in psychology. He recognized that therapy was not just about intellectual understanding but about emotional experiences and the dynamic interplay between therapist and client. This relational aspect is a cornerstone of modern psychotherapy.
The Evolution of Relational Psychoanalysis
Building on Freud’s foundational work, relational psychoanalysis emerged as a significant force in contemporary therapy. This approach, championed by thinkers like Stephen Mitchell and Jessica Benjamin, shifted the focus from the isolated mind of the individual to the interactions and relationships that shape a person’s psyche. Relational psychoanalysis posits that our sense of self is formed and continually reshaped through our relationships with others.
In relational psychoanalysis, the therapist-client relationship is seen as a microcosm of the client’s broader relational patterns. The therapeutic relationship itself becomes a space where new, healthier patterns can be explored and enacted. Unlike traditional psychoanalysis, which might focus on the therapist as a neutral observer, relational psychoanalysis views the therapist as an active participant in the therapeutic process. The mutual influence between therapist and client is acknowledged and utilized as a tool for change.
This perspective emphasizes that healing occurs not just through insight into past experiences but through the experience of a different kind of relationship within therapy—one that is authentic, validating, and empowering. The therapist’s genuine engagement, empathy, and responsiveness are crucial in creating a space where the client can explore their vulnerabilities, fears, and desires.
The Broader Field of Psychotherapy: Diverse Approaches, Unified Goals
Beyond psychoanalysis, various other schools of thought have contributed to the understanding of the therapeutic process. Humanistic psychologists like Carl Rogers emphasized the importance of unconditional positive regard, empathy, and genuineness in therapy. Rogers believed that for clients to grow and heal, they needed to feel deeply understood and accepted by their therapist. His person-centered approach underscored the idea that the therapeutic relationship itself is a powerful agent of change.
Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), while often seen as more structured and goal-oriented, also recognizes the importance of the therapeutic alliance. Studies have shown that the quality of the relationship between therapist and client significantly influences outcomes, even in more directive therapies like CBT. The trust and collaboration between client and therapist create a foundation for effective intervention, regardless of the specific techniques used.
The Essence of Therapy: Connection, Understanding, and Growth
At its essence, psychology and psychotherapy are about connection—connecting with oneself, with others, and with deeper truths about the human experience. The therapeutic relationship is a space where clients can explore who they are, how they relate to others, and how they can grow and change. This relationship is not just a means to an end; it is an end in itself, a vital part of the healing process.
In a world that often prioritizes quick fixes and measurable outcomes, it’s crucial to remember the deeper purpose of therapy. The true essence of psychology is not in symptom reduction alone but in fostering a journey of self-discovery, growth, and transformation. It’s about helping people understand themselves more deeply, connect more authentically with others, and live more meaningful lives.
Relational Psychoanalysis: A New Paradigm for Understanding
Relational psychoanalysis offers a unique lens through which to view the therapeutic process. It challenges the notion of the therapist as a detached expert and instead positions them as a co-participant in the therapeutic journey. This approach recognizes that both therapist and client bring their histories, biases, and relational patterns into the therapy room, and that these dynamics play a crucial role in the process of change.
The relational approach also highlights the importance of power dynamics in therapy. It acknowledges that the therapist, by virtue of their role, holds power in the relationship, but it also emphasizes the need for the therapist to be aware of this power and to use it responsibly. By fostering a collaborative, egalitarian relationship, the therapist can create a space where the client feels empowered to explore and transform their relational patterns.
Conclusion: Reclaiming the Essence of Psychology
In today’s fast-paced, outcome-driven world, it’s easy to lose sight of the true essence of psychology and psychotherapy. But the work of Freud, Rogers, and the pioneers of relational psychoanalysis reminds us that the heart of therapy lies in the relationship between therapist and client. It’s in this relationship that healing, growth, and transformation occur.
As we move forward in the field of psychology, it’s essential to hold onto these core values. Therapy should not be reduced to a set of techniques or quick fixes; it should be a space where genuine human connection and understanding take place. By prioritizing the therapeutic relationship, we honor the true essence of psychology—a field dedicated to helping people live fuller, more meaningful lives.
Learn More
The State of Mainstream Psychology in India: A Patch on Capitalism
Psychology has historically been seen as a vital field dedicated to understanding the human mind and behavior, fostering well-being, and addressing mental health issues. But lately, it feels like the field is being co-opted by capitalism, especially within corporate settings. This shift has compromised the essence of psychology, reducing it to a tool that serves economic interests rather than prioritizing genuine mental health care.
The Essence of Psychology
At its core, psychology aims to delve deeply into the experience of the human psyche, exploring factors that influence thoughts, emotions, and behaviors. The therapeutic relationship between a psychologist and a client is most important factor. It requires patience, empathy, and a commitment from therapist side for long-term healing. Most of the approaches of psychology emphasize the importance of this relationship, focusing on understanding the client’s experiences and fostering a journey of self-discovery and growth. But the modern-day crisis has made us forget about this very basic idea of the therapeutic relationship.
The Corporate Influence
The corporate sector, driven by profit and efficiency, often demands quick fixes and measurable outcomes. This clashes with the fundamental principles of psychology, which advocate for a thorough and patient approach to mental health care. My recent job interviews in corporate mental health settings really brought this to light.
For instance, during an interview at a well-known hospital, I was made to wait for two and a half hours before being called in. When the interview finally began, the psychiatrist conducting it was clearly in a hurry and disinterested in my responses. He didn’t even seem to know the difference between relational psychoanalysis and classical psychodynamics, and showing dismissive attitude towards a field he seemingly knew little about, was disheartening. This showed a glaring disconnect between what corporate settings expect and what real psychological practice should be about.
The Agitation of the Corporate Therapist
The psychiatrist’s frustration during my interview, especially after a long day, reflects a broader issue in corporate mental health settings. Therapists in these environments are often overworked and under pressure to deliver quick results. This pressure can lead to a superficial approach to therapy, focusing on immediate symptom relief rather than addressing underlying issues. These shortcuts undermine the therapeutic process and serve the capitalist demand for efficiency over real effectiveness.
The Loss of True Therapeutic Value
In a capitalist framework, the deep, relational aspects of therapy are often overshadowed by a need for productivity and cost-effectiveness. People seeking help from their mental health struggles end up in a system that’s just as stressful as what they’re trying to escape. Therapists, too, become cogs in the capitalist machine, unable to practice the patient, empathetic care that is essential for true healing.
The Call for Change
It’s crucial to recognize and resist the capitalist encroachment on psychology. The field must reclaim its roots, emphasizing the importance of the therapeutic relationship and the slow, patient work of understanding and healing. Mental health care should not be about quick fixes but about fostering genuine, long-term well-being.
The essence of psychology lies in its ability to connect deeply with individuals, understand their unique experiences, and guide them towards self-realization and healing. As we face the challenges of modern life, we need to protect this essence, resisting the pressures of capitalism to ensure that psychology remains a source of hope and healing in an increasingly stressful world.
Learn More