
Living in Survival Mode: How Modern Age Reshapes Our Minds and Relationships?
In today’s fast-paced, hyper-competitive world, our bodies and minds are constantly subjected to the relentless demands of capitalism. The modern age forces our nervous system to navigate a world where rest is seen as laziness, productivity is the sole measure of worth, and scarcity is an ever-present reality. Under such pressures, our mental well-being is compromised, and our relationships suffer, leaving us feeling isolated and disconnected. From a relational and psychoanalytic perspective, it becomes clear that our psychological distress is deeply rooted in the societal structures that shape our daily existence.
The Modern Age Grip on Our Nervous System
Our nervous system, biologically wired for connection, safety, and homeostasis, is now entrapped in a perpetual state of survival. The demands of capitalism—deadlines, bills, unpaid labor, and the omnipresent hustle culture—push our bodies to their limits while constantly demanding more. This relentless pace forces individuals into hypervigilance, keeping their nervous system in a chronic state of fight-or-flight.
Consider how often you check your emails first thing in the morning, your heart racing with anticipation of missed deadlines. Or the way your stomach knots at the thought of an unexpected expense. These are not isolated experiences but rather symptoms of a system designed to keep you on edge, always preparing for the next challenge.
Recent comments from corporate leaders, such as L&T chairman advocating for a 90-hour workweek and Narayana Murthy suggesting a 70-hour workweek, reflect the deep-seated obsession with overwork. These statements reinforce the toxic cultural norm that equates long hours with dedication and success, despite the detrimental impact on mental and physical health. The capitalist framework infiltrates our psyche, shaping our internal narratives around self-worth and adequacy. The unconscious message embedded within these societal structures is clear: “You are only as good as your productivity.” As a result, individuals struggle with feelings of guilt and shame whenever they attempt to step back, rest, or prioritize their emotional needs.
The Impact on Relationships and the Self
In relational psychoanalysis, the therapeutic relationship itself is seen as a primary agent of healing. However, within a capitalist framework, relationships often become transactional rather than meaningful, driven by efficiency rather than genuine connection. When people are caught in the cycle of overwork and survival, the ability to engage in deep, emotionally nourishing relationships diminishes.
For example, a friend’s message asking to meet might feel like another task to squeeze into your packed schedule, rather than an opportunity for genuine connection. Conversations with loved ones may revolve around work stress, financial concerns, or future plans—leaving little space for emotional presence and authenticity.
Attachment theories suggest that our earliest relational experiences shape our sense of self and capacity for connection. Capitalism, by prioritizing individualism and competition, disrupts these attachment bonds and fosters a sense of isolation. In this way, our basic human need for connection and intimacy is deprioritized, leaving us in an emotional desert, longing for meaningful engagement but unable to access it due to exhaustion and stress.
The Illusion of Control and the Internalization of Capitalist Ideals
Capitalism thrives on the illusion of control. It convinces individuals that if they just work harder, plan better, or stay constantly “on,” they can achieve security and fulfillment. This belief aligns with psychoanalytic concepts of the superego—the internalized voice of societal expectations and pressures. The capitalist superego is unforgiving, pushing individuals toward unattainable ideals of success and productivity. It fosters an internal critic that constantly questions, “Am I doing enough?” leading to pervasive self-doubt and an ever-present sense of failure.
The internalization of these capitalist ideals creates a split within the self. One part strives for rest and connection, while the other feels guilty for not being productive enough. This internal conflict often manifests as anxiety, depression, and somatic symptoms such as chronic fatigue, headaches, and digestive issues.
Shame and the Need to Prove Worth
One of the most profound effects of capitalism on the psyche is the creation of shame—a deeply felt sense of not being enough. Psychoanalyst Donald Winnicott emphasized the importance of the “true self” and “false self.” Under capitalism, individuals often adopt a false self that aligns with societal expectations while suppressing their true desires, needs, and vulnerabilities. This results in a profound disconnection from the self and others, as individuals are forced to perform a role that keeps them alienated from their authentic selves.
Shame often arises when individuals cannot meet the unrealistic standards set by capitalism. They feel inadequate, not because they lack capability, but because the system is designed to foster feelings of insufficiency. This experience of shame becomes internalized, further entrenching the belief that self-worth is tied solely to output and external validation.
Breaking Free: Reclaiming Rest and Connection
Healing from the psychological impact of capitalism requires a conscious effort to reclaim rest, connection, and self-compassion. From a relational perspective, healing can occur through relationships that validate one’s intrinsic worth beyond productivity. Seeking therapy, engaging in meaningful conversations, and building communities that prioritize mutual support over competition can help individuals reframe their narratives around success and self-worth.
Consider setting boundaries with work, reclaiming time for activities that nourish your soul, and seeking relationships where you feel valued for who you are, not what you achieve.
Psychoanalytic therapy offers a space to explore and dismantle the unconscious internalization of capitalist values. Through this process, individuals can begin to recognize how societal pressures have shaped their self-perceptions and work toward reclaiming their autonomy and authenticity.
Moving Toward a Sustainable Future
As we navigate this modern world, it is crucial to challenge the pervasive belief that exhaustion is a prerequisite for success. We must advocate for systemic changes that prioritize human well-being over profit, recognizing that true mental health thrives in environments that honor rest, emotional expression, and relational depth.
By understanding the profound impact of capitalism on our nervous system through a relational and psychoanalytic lens, we can begin to foster healthier ways of living, working, and relating—ones that prioritize authenticity, connection, and true well-being.
Learn More
The Socio-Psychogenesis of Suicide in Kota: A Psychologist’s Reflections
As a psychologist working in Kota, I am deeply immersed in the lives of students who come to this city, carrying the weight of countless expectations. These young individuals, often between the ages of 15 and 23, leave their families and familiar surroundings to prepare for some of India’s most competitive entrance exams, such as JEE and NEET. While some of their stories are inspiring, they are also profoundly tragic, as many buckle under immense pressure. The alarming rate of student suicides in Kota is a manifestation of a complex web of social, familial, systemic, and individual factors.
Sitting across from these students in counselling and therapy sessions, I often hear narratives tinged with anxiety, despair, and hopelessness. The emotional toll they endure is palpable, and while their pain is immediate, the causes of their struggles run deep into the structures of our education system, societal values, and familial expectations.
The Burden of Student Responsibility
It is easy for people to point fingers at students themselves, blaming their inability to cope or labelling them as too fragile to handle challenges. However, such simplifications only serve to absolve others of their responsibility. These adolescents, still developing emotionally and psychologically, are thrust into an unforgiving environment where their worth is measured solely by ranks and results.
In counselling sessions, I have often reflected on a fundamental issue: many students do not know why they are here. They come to Kota with dreams of clearing the JEE or NEET exams, not because they genuinely aspire to be engineers or doctors, but because societal and familial pressures have convinced them that these professions are the only path to a prosperous and meaningful life. But is this “knowing” genuine? True knowing involves an internal sense of purpose and clarity, not the blind acceptance of external expectations. Without this inner sense of direction, their journey becomes one of constant self-doubt and despair, compounding the pressures they already face.
As much as I try to help them reframe these thoughts, I cannot ignore the systemic and societal factors that reinforce these beliefs. It is not the students who fail but the environment around them that sets them up for such profound despair.
Families and the Unyielding Weight of Expectations
In many cases, parents and other family members play a critical role in shaping the pressures their children feel. Kota is not just a city for these families; it is a beacon of hope and aspiration. Parents often see the city as a means to secure their children’s futures, investing substantial financial resources to enroll them in renowned coaching institutes. This investment is not merely monetary but also emotional.
Many parents approach this journey with good intentions, wanting the best for their children. Yet, these intentions often morph into overwhelming expectations. In my conversations with students, I hear them speak about their parents’ sacrifices—selling land, taking loans, or foregoing personal comforts—all to fund their education in Kota. These sacrifices, while commendable, place an unbearable burden on the child to succeed.
Students often mention, “I feel like I am living my parents’ dream, not mine. If I fail, I will ruin their lives.” These words stayed with me, highlighting how the pressure to succeed is often about fulfilling familial aspirations rather than personal ambitions.
In many families, there is also an emotional disconnect. Parents, preoccupied with the financial and logistical demands of this journey, may not recognize the psychological struggles their children face. Mental health is still a taboo topic in many Indian households, and students are often discouraged from expressing vulnerability. When they do speak up, they may be met with dismissive comments like “Just focus on your studies” or “Everyone else is managing, why can’t you?”
Society’s Unyielding Standards
Beyond the family, societal expectations amplify the pressure students feel. In India, success is narrowly defined by a few prestigious professions, particularly in engineering and medicine. Society places an almost mythical value on securing admission to institutions like IITs and AIIMS, equating this achievement with intelligence, respectability, and upward mobility.
The societal obsession with these professions creates a culture of hyper-competitiveness, where students are judged not only by their results but also by their ability to surpass their peers. This relentless comparison erodes their self-esteem and fosters a toxic environment where failure is stigmatized.
In my work, I have seen how societal judgment seeps into the psyche of students. They fear not only their own disappointment but also the shame they believe their families will endure if they fail. Students said, “If I don’t get a good rank, my neighbours will say my parents wasted their money. I can’t let that happen.” This external judgment adds an unbearable layer of stress to an already overwhelming situation.
The Role of the Coaching Industry and Education System
The education system and coaching industry are central to the pressures students face. Kota’s reputation as a coaching hub is both its greatest strength and its greatest weakness. On one hand, the city offers unparalleled resources and expertise for competitive exam preparation. On the other hand, it fosters a culture that prioritizes results over well-being.
Coaching institutes operate like factories, churning out toppers to enhance their reputations. Students are subjected to gruelling schedules, often studying for 12–14 hours a day. The emphasis is solely on academic performance, with little attention paid to their mental or emotional health.
I have visited these institutes and spoken with faculty members, and while many express concern for their students, the structure of the system leaves little room for compassion. Mock tests, rankings, and cutthroat competition dominate the landscape, creating an environment where students feel like mere numbers.
The education system also bears responsibility. India’s focus on high-stakes exams creates an atmosphere of scarcity, where securing a limited number of seats in prestigious institutions becomes a do-or-die situation. This scarcity fuels the coaching industry’s growth while neglecting the broader question of how education should serve the holistic development of individuals.
The State’s Apathy
The role of the state in this crisis is both glaring and appalling. Despite the well-documented pressures faced by students in Kota, there is a severe lack of mental health infrastructure in the city. There are too few counselors and psychologists to address the needs of the tens of thousands of students who come here every year.
Moreover, the state’s failure to regulate coaching institutes allows these organizations to prioritize profits over student welfare. There is little accountability for how these institutes operate or the impact they have on students’ mental health.
Government initiatives to promote mental health awareness often remain superficial, failing to address the systemic issues that drive students to despair. As a psychologist, I often feel like I am working in isolation, trying to put out fires in an environment that constantly fans the flames.
A Culture of Silence
One of the most heartbreaking aspects of this crisis is the culture of silence surrounding it. Families, coaching institutes, and society at large often avoid addressing the issue of student suicides, treating them as isolated incidents rather than symptoms of a systemic problem.
When suicides do occur, the narrative often shifts to blame the individual student for their perceived weakness, ignoring the broader structures that contributed to their despair. This refusal to engage with the root causes perpetuates the cycle of pressure and tragedy.
Personal Reflections
As a psychologist, I carry the weight of these stories with me long after the counseling sessions end. I have seen students break down, sharing their fears and vulnerabilities in ways they cannot with their families or peers. Each story is a reminder of the immense challenges they face and the urgent need for systemic change.
There have been moments of hope, too—instances where a student begins to see their worth beyond academic results, or where a parent starts to understand the importance of emotional support. These moments keep me going, but they also highlight how much work remains to be done.
In Kota, the lives of students hang in a delicate balance between hope and despair. They come here with dreams, but too many leave as cautionary tales. This city, and the systems that support it, must reckon with the human cost of its success. Only then can we hope to create an environment where students can thrive not just academically but as whole, resilient individuals.
This issue is deeply personal to me, not only because of the work I do but because I see in these students a reflection of our collective values and priorities. Their struggles are a mirror to our society, urging us to confront uncomfortable truths and take responsibility for the environments we create. It is not just their dreams that are at stake but their lives—and that demands nothing less than our full attention and commitment.
Learn More
Why Do We Always Push Ourselves Beyond Our Limits?
In today’s fast-paced world, the pressure to push ourselves beyond our limits feels almost unavoidable. From work deadlines to personal goals, the expectation to do more, achieve faster, and be better is everywhere. Social media highlights success stories, while corporate culture rewards non-stop productivity. It’s easy to fall into the trap of believing that slowing down means falling behind.
But what drives this relentless push? Is it ambition, societal pressure, or something deeper within us? Beyond the surface of daily hustle lies a psychological landscape shaped by early life experiences, societal expectations, and our need for connection and validation. Understanding why we push ourselves—and at what cost—requires exploring these forces. Why do we find it so hard to rest, to say “enough,” and to accept our limits as humans? The answer lies not just in what the world demands of us but in what we unconsciously demand from ourselves.
The Modern World’s Relationship with Limits
Our current relationship with limits is deeply influenced by modern societal values rooted in productivity and achievement. The industrial and technological revolutions, which promised to free us from toil through machines and automation, ironically reshaped how we perceive time and worth. With the rise of machine intelligence, many hoped that humanity would finally have more leisure and rest. But instead, technological progress has intensified the demand for constant availability, efficiency, and output.
What was once human is now measured in mechanical terms: output, performance, and productivity. We internalize this, seeing rest as a failure rather than a necessity. To stop or slow down feels like falling behind, as if being human—with our emotional needs, exhaustion, and limitations—is inherently flawed. In a world that runs on speed and production, being bound by human limits feels like being left behind.
The Psychological Roots of Overextension
From a psychoanalytic perspective, the compulsion to push ourselves stems from unconscious emotional drives often formed in early relationships. Our personal histories shape how we relate to success, failure, and self-worth. Many of us internalize expectations from caregivers, teachers, or societal messages, which later manifest in adult life as a need to overachieve.
For example, a child whose value was recognized only through accomplishments might grow into an adult driven by perfectionism, seeking validation through endless productivity. This adult might struggle with feelings of worthlessness unless they are constantly achieving, as though rest invalidates their existence. Similarly, someone who faced instability in early life may believe that control over work and success can compensate for earlier helplessness.
Psychoanalysis also emphasizes the role of unconscious guilt. Many people unknowingly believe they must “earn” rest or joy. They feel guilty when they are not working or accomplishing something tangible, as if stopping threatens their self-worth. This dynamic is reinforced by a society that glorifies hustle and views vulnerability or stillness as weakness.
The Relational Impact of Ignoring Limits
The consequences of ignoring personal limits extend beyond the individual, affecting relationships in profound ways. When people are constantly pushing themselves, they have little energy left for emotional intimacy or meaningful connection. They may become emotionally distant, irritable, or consumed by work, leaving partners, friends, and family feeling neglected or secondary.
Moreover, pushing beyond limits can create unconscious relational conflicts. When one partner in a relationship overworks or strives excessively, they may expect the same level of sacrifice from the other, fostering resentment or feelings of inadequacy. Relationships become transactional, based on productivity rather than emotional presence.
There is also a subtle societal competition in how people discuss being “busy” or “stressed.” It’s almost a badge of honor—a way of saying, “I’m important because I’m constantly needed.” This creates a cycle where being busy becomes a status symbol, making it even harder to honor limits without feeling left behind or insignificant.
The Need to Reclaim Our Humanity
To honor our limits is to reclaim what it means to be human. We are not machines designed for endless production; we are emotional, relational beings whose worth cannot be measured by how much we accomplish. Limits are not flaws to overcome—they are reminders that we exist within a natural rhythm of effort and rest, work and reflection, giving and receiving.
Relational psychoanalysis reminds us that healing comes from being truly seen and accepted, not for what we do but for who we are. Just as a therapist offers unconditional acceptance to a client, we must learn to extend the same compassion to ourselves. Recognizing our limits allows us to reconnect with ourselves and others from a place of authenticity, rather than performance.
In the words of psychoanalyst Donald Winnicott, “It is a joy to be hidden, and a disaster not to be found.” This statement underscores the need for rest, solitude, and being known beyond what we can produce. Allowing ourselves to be “hidden”—to pause, to breathe—doesn’t make us weak. It allows us to be found again by others and, most importantly, by ourselves.
The limits we push against are often the very boundaries that preserve our humanity. Acknowledging them doesn’t mean giving up; it means embracing the fullness of life—its highs and lows, its action and rest. We are not infinite, and that is not a limitation. It is what makes us beautifully, imperfectly human.
Learn More
Why We Feel So Disconnected in A Connected World?
In today’s hyper-connected world, we have more ways than ever to stay in touch. Social media, messaging apps, video calls, and emails keep us looped into each other’s lives constantly. Yet, an overwhelming number of people report feeling lonely, disconnected, or even alienated from those around them. Why is it that, despite this technological closeness, we often feel so emotionally distant? Through a psychoanalytic and relational lens, we can explore some of the deeper reasons for this modern sense of disconnection.
The Illusion of Connection: Quantity vs. Quality
While we may have hundreds or thousands of “friends” on social media, the quality of these relationships often lacks depth. In psychoanalytic terms, true connection relies on authentic, vulnerable exchanges where we feel truly seen and understood by another. This requires time, mutuality, and presence—qualities often missing in a quick text or “like” on a photo. Shallow interactions, though numerous, don’t fulfill our need for genuine connection. It’s like skimming the surface without ever diving into the depths.
In relational psychoanalysis, thinkers like Stephen Mitchell and Jessica Benjamin emphasize the importance of “shared reality” and the “recognition process.” This is the idea that feeling connected goes beyond superficial acknowledgment; it requires an exchange that affirms our reality and values the unique nuances of who we are. Unfortunately, the brevity and speed of online interactions rarely allow for this kind of relational depth, leading us to feel unseen, even among hundreds of “friends.”
Social Media and the Performance of Self
On social media, we often curate and present idealized versions of ourselves, consciously or unconsciously hiding the messy, complex parts. While this polished portrayal may attract admiration, it can also amplify feelings of isolation. This dissonance, between the online persona and our true selves, can be jarring. We may gain validation for a carefully edited photo or update, but our unfiltered emotions and authentic struggles remain hidden.
This practice creates a type of “false self,” a concept introduced by psychoanalyst D.W. Winnicott. He described the “false self” as a defensive facade that people construct to hide vulnerabilities. When we interact through a persona, we create a distance between our inner world and how we’re perceived. Though social media offers us a constant flow of interaction, it often reinforces this facade, making it harder to connect genuinely. We receive validation for an image that doesn’t fully represent us, leading to a sense of inner emptiness or disconnection.
The Loneliness of Constant Comparison
Endless scrolling exposes us to a curated highlight reel of other people’s lives, leading to comparisons that can sap our self-esteem. Seeing others’ successes, relationships, and adventures can trigger feelings of inadequacy and amplify insecurities, especially when we’re struggling. This type of engagement lacks reciprocity and doesn’t allow us to feel truly known or connected.
Psychoanalyst Heinz Kohut’s concept of “self-object needs” can provide insight here. Kohut argued that we need others to help us form a cohesive sense of self; we look to people as “self-objects” who mirror our worth and stability. Online, though, we’re flooded with comparison rather than genuine mirroring. While we look for validation, we often encounter competition, triggering self-doubt rather than connection. Over time, this can weaken our sense of self-worth and leave us feeling isolated.
The Decline of Uninterrupted, Real-Life Connections
Relational psychoanalysis suggests that human connection is a dance of presence and attunement. This type of connection happens when people are fully present, without distractions. However, our constant access to technology interrupts these moments. We’re often physically present but mentally elsewhere, half-engaged in conversation while checking notifications.
These interruptions may seem trivial, but they chip away at the feeling of being truly valued and understood. Imagine sharing something meaningful with someone only to find them glancing at their phone mid-sentence. This lack of attunement can make us feel unseen, fostering an emotional distance that leads to a deeper sense of isolation.
The Cycle of Disconnection and Escapism
When we feel isolated, we often turn back to the very devices and platforms that contribute to this sense of disconnection. We scroll, swipe, and refresh as a way of coping with loneliness, hoping to find something that will fill the void. However, each time we turn to our devices for comfort, we are reinforcing a cycle where we avoid true connection and settle for temporary distractions. This reinforces the disconnection rather than alleviating it, keeping us trapped in a loop.
Psychoanalytically speaking, this is a form of avoidance. Instead of facing uncomfortable emotions or exploring the roots of our loneliness, we’re sidetracked by fleeting notifications or viral videos. This leaves us both emotionally unsatisfied and dependent on a form of engagement that never fully meets our relational needs.
Moving Toward Real Connection: Suggestions for Breaking the Cycle
- Cultivate Presence in Relationships: Start by being fully present when you’re with others. Put away devices during conversations, and give undivided attention to the people you’re with. This small change can foster trust, intimacy, and a sense of being valued.
- Set Boundaries with Technology: Create specific times for checking notifications, and avoid using your phone as an emotional crutch. By reducing impulsive scrolling, you open up time to process your thoughts and engage in meaningful activities.
- Engage in Self-Reflection: If you find yourself picking up your phone during moments of discomfort, take a pause. Ask yourself what emotion you’re trying to avoid. Are you feeling lonely, anxious, or bored? By facing these emotions directly, you can learn to cope with them more constructively.
- Seek Depth Over Quantity: Try to deepen a few close relationships rather than scattering your attention across many superficial connections. Investing in fewer, more meaningful friendships can fulfill your relational needs in a way that online interactions rarely do.
- Engage in Self-Compassion and Authenticity: Practice being open about your struggles and imperfections. Vulnerability is the foundation of trust, and true connection is often formed through shared authentic experiences. By being honest about who you are, you invite others to do the same.
A World of Connection Requires Intentional Effort
Despite the barriers created by technology, the ability to forge meaningful connections remains within our reach. By understanding why we feel disconnected and actively choosing depth and presence over convenience, we can begin to cultivate relationships that truly fulfill us.
Ultimately, connection requires a level of vulnerability and a willingness to be present that goes beyond likes, shares, or quick exchanges. Through self-awareness and intentional effort, we can foster the real, lasting bonds that make us feel deeply connected in an increasingly digital world.
Learn More
The State of Mainstream Psychology and Mental Health in India: A Patch on Capitalism
Psychology has long been recognized as a vital field focused on understanding the human mind and behavior, fostering well-being, and addressing mental health disorders. However, recently, it feels as though the psychology and mental health in India are being co-opted by capitalism, particularly in corporate settings. This shift has compromised the essence of psychology, reducing it to a tool that serves economic interests rather than prioritizing genuine mental health care.
The Essence of Psychology
At its core, psychology is dedicated to exploring the complexities of the human psyche, considering factors that influence thoughts, emotions, and behaviors. The therapeutic relationship between a psychologist and a client is the most important factor in effective mental health care. It requires patience, empathy, and a deep commitment to long-term healing. Most psychological approaches emphasize the importance of this relationship, focusing on understanding the client’s experiences and fostering a journey of self-realization and growth. However, the modern-day crisis in mental health care has made us forget this fundamental idea of the therapeutic relationship.
The Corporate Influence on Mental Health
The corporate sector, driven by profit and efficiency, often demands quick fixes and measurable outcomes. This creates a clash with the fundamental principles of psychology, which advocate for a thorough and patient approach to mental health treatment. For instance, my recent job interviews in corporate mental health settings highlighted this disconnect.
During one interview at a well-known hospital, I was made to wait for two and a half hours before being called in. When the interview finally began, the psychiatrist seemed disinterested, impatient, and hurried. He didn’t even seem to differentiate between relational psychoanalysis and classical psychodynamics, dismissing a field he clearly didn’t understand. This interaction reflected a larger issue in corporate mental health settings: the prioritization of efficiency and profit over meaningful, patient-centered care.
The Agitation of the Corporate Therapist
The psychiatrist’s frustration during the interview, especially after a long day, underscores a broader issue in corporate mental health environments. Therapists working in these settings are often overworked and under pressure to deliver immediate results. This pressure can lead to a superficial approach to therapy, focusing on short-term symptom relief rather than addressing underlying mental health struggles. These shortcuts undermine the therapeutic process and cater to the capitalist demand for quick fixes in therapy, rather than true emotional healing.
The Loss of True Therapeutic Value
In a capitalist framework, the deep, relational aspects of therapy are often overshadowed by the need for productivity and cost-effectiveness. People seeking help for their emotional distress are often caught in a system that is just as stressful as the one they are trying to escape. Therapists, too, become cogs in the capitalist machine, unable to practice the patient, empathetic care that is essential for true mental health care. As a result, the essence of therapy — fostering emotional well-being and long-term healing — is lost in favor of short-term productivity.
The Call for Change
It’s crucial to recognize and resist the growing capitalist influence on psychology. The field must reclaim its roots, emphasizing the importance of the therapeutic relationship and the slow, patient work of understanding and healing. Mental health care should not be reduced to a series of quick fixes but should focus on fostering genuine, long-term well-being. The therapeutic process should be seen as a journey of self-realization, where therapists work to understand their clients’ unique experiences, helping them grow emotionally and mentally.
As we face the challenges of modern life, it is essential to protect the essence of psychology, resisting the pressures of capitalism that threaten its ability to provide meaningful, effective care. Mental health care should always prioritize healing, understanding, and emotional growth over mere productivity. Only then can we ensure that psychology remains a source of hope, healing, and support in an increasingly stressful world.
(Keywords: Mental health care, Anxiety disorders, Depression treatment, Corporate mental health, Relational psychoanalysis, Classical psychodynamics, Mental health struggles, Emotional well-being, Chronic stress, Therapeutic relationship, Capitalism in mental health, Quick fixes in therapy, Long-term healing, Psychosocial approaches, Mental health disorders, Mental Health In India, Mental health advocacy, Self-realization, Emotional distress.)
Learn More